ROSE DEEB, A/K/A ROSE DEEB KITCHEN, APPELLANT,
v.
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLEE
ROSE DEEB, A/K/A ROSE DEEB KITCHEN, APPELLANT,
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLEE
352 So. 2d 1271
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1977)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Although we do not find the trial giving rise to the final judgment here appealed to be free of error, the record reveals that (apparently as trial strategy by experienced attorneys which we do not criticize) the errors were not preserved for review here. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed and the appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees incident to this appeal is denied.
AFFIRMED.
McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. State, 376 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 1979)…SUNDBERG, Justice. By petition for writ of certiorari, petitioner seeks review of the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reported at 355 So. 2d 138, which is alleged to be in conflict with Fullard v. State, 352 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). The issue presented is whether a criminal defendant, in order to plead nolo contendere and specifically reserve his right to appeal, must show that the legal issue reserved for appeal is dispositive of the case. We have jurisdic…
-
Morgan v. State, 486 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…ther conservative path. In Brown v. State, 376 So. 2d 382 (Fla.1979), the court held that an Ashby nolo plea is permissible only when the legal issue is dispositive of the case, expressly disapproving the contrary result reached in Fullard v. State, 352 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Brown also held that “as a matter of law a confession may not be considered dispositive of the case.” In Martinez v. State, 368 So. 2d 338 (Fla.1979), the Court held that a trial court's pretrial ruling on requested jury instruc…
-
Byron v. State of Fla. ex rel. Robert W. Schellenberg & Robert L. Shevin, 360 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)…id not induce its employees to give the information sought by the action; and the information sought was simply the names and addresses of employees. . See Daniell v. Sherrill, 48 So. 2d 736, 739 (Fla.1950), and authorities cited; Fullard v. State, 352 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); McLaughlin v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 465 Pa. 104, 348 A. 2d 376 (1975); and the three-judge district court’s decision in Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, 408 F.Supp. 321, 359 (D.C.D.C.1976), which attributed m…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence