A. C. GRANT AND SUE W. GRANT, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
WINDLEY ISLAND PROPERTY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
A. C. GRANT AND SUE W. GRANT, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
WINDLEY ISLAND PROPERTY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
87 So. 2d 108
Florida Supreme Court (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
' PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court and it appearing to the-court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal aré without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed. ' '
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Miami v. Granlund, 153 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 1963)…*.” F.S.A. § 440.13. The record indicates that other objections by the City to the payment in question are raised initially and improperly in its brief here. . Continental Casualty Co. v. Buchan, Fla.1954, 72 So. 2d 269. . Lyng v. Rao, Fla.1956, 87 So. 2d 108.…
-
Veterans Admin. v. Allen, 14 Fla. Supp. 203 (Fla. Industrial Comm'n 1959)…sons cited above, we are of the opinion that as a matter of law, the deputy commissioner erred and that the statement for remedial services rendered claimant, submitted by the Veterans Administration should be paid. (See also Lyng v. Rao, Fla. 1956, 87 So. 2d 108). Accordingly, it is ordered that that portion of the deputy’s order denying and dismissing the claim in the amount of $3,182.52 for remedial services rendered by the Veterans Administration is stricken. It is further ordered that the statutory em…
-
Johnson Drug Co. & Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Thaxton, 121 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1960)…recognized practitioner, nurse or hospital, and for such period, as the nature of the injury or the process of recovery may require, including medicines, crutches, artificial members, and other apparatus * * *» Our opinion in Lyng v. Rao, Fla.1956, 87 So. 2d 108, 110 might give the same impression. In that case this Court ruled that the carrier should have paid the bill rendered “for the care and treatment of the claimant regardless of who rendered such services, provided such services were rendered in conn…