AMERICAN CONTINENTAL INVESTMENT, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
JACK BOROFSKY AND DAVID HERSHKOWITZ, APPELLEES
AMERICAN CONTINENTAL INVESTMENT, INC., APPELLANT,
JACK BOROFSKY AND DAVID HERSHKOWITZ, APPELLEES
87 So. 2d 419
Florida Supreme Court (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 38 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (19 total)
-
Strawgate v. Dorothea Chase Turner, 339 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 1976)…ect and are entitled to the same weight as a jury verdict. Read v. Frizzell, 60 So. 2d 172 (Fla.1952). Findings by trial court will not be disturbed unless there is a lack of substantial evidence to support the court’s conclusion. Chakford v. Strum, 87 So. 2d 419 (Fla.1956). Our examination of the record convinces us that the trial court had ample evidence before it as a basis for its judgment. In reaching a contrary decision the District Court improperly substituted its judgment for the trial court’s. Acc…
-
Krohne v. Orlando Farming Corp., 102 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958)…jury by parties, judge’s findings are entitled to weight of jury verdict, before reviewing court, and will not be disturbed unless it is shown that there is total lack of substantial evidence to support his conclusion.” Chakford v. Strum, Fla.1956, 87 So. 2d 419, 420. Keeping this in mind we will examine the testimony of the two above named witnesses. The appellants urged that Dr. Edwards’ testimony should not have been received, but, having been received, the testimony has no validity. Dr. Edwards’ backgr…
-
Flagler Ctr. Bldg. Loan Corp. v. Chem. Realty Corp., 363 So. 2d 344 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)…e mortgage is a finding of fact which arrives in this court with a presumption of its correctness. Further, for this court to reverse such a finding of fact, there must be a lack of substantial evidence to support the finding. See Chakford v. Strum, 87 So. 2d 419 (Fla.1956); Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co. v. Novack, 284 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). This record reviewed in that light supports the finding of the trial judge in that it shows that in reliance upon the representations of Chemical Realty,…
Previewing 3 of 19 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence