LANDER HAIGE, ALLAN HAIGE AND MARIE F. HAIGE, HIS WIFE, AND ENAR HAIGE, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS ENER HAIGE, AND ALICE W. HAIGE, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
JEFFERSON STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, APPELLEE
LANDER HAIGE, ALLAN HAIGE AND MARIE F. HAIGE, HIS WIFE, AND ENAR HAIGE, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS ENER HAIGE, AND ALICE W. HAIGE, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
JEFFERSON STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, APPELLEE
87 So. 2d 812
Florida Supreme Court (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
David Props., Inc. v. Selk, 151 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963)…a claim under that statute in its answer and counterclaim, the defendant cannot be awarded even that amount of rent, under the holdings in Painter v. Town of Groveland, 79 So. 2d 765, 767 (S.C.Fla., 1955), and Central Florida Oil Co. v. Blue Flame, 87 So. 2d 812, 814 (S.C.Fla., 1956). In that final contention the plaintiff is quite correct; those decisions so hold, and the defendant agrees. The plaintiff then refers, for the rule as to what damages, if any, are recoverable by the defendant “in the absence…
-
Greentree Amusement Arcade v. Greenacres Dev. Corp. & Greenacres Mgmt. Corp., 401 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)…tenant”. The tenant urges that, since he remained on the leased premises under a bona fide claim of right, he could not be considered a tenant who held over in wilful derogation of the terms of the tenancy. Central Florida Oil Company v. Blue Flame, 87 So. 2d 812 (Fla.1956); Painter v. Town of Groveland, 79 So. 2d 765 (Fla.1965). The tenant insists that he held over under a bona fide claim of right since, (1) he had a renewal option that he believed had been validly exercised regardless of his prior receipt…