EVERETT WILLIAM ANDERSON, APPELLANT,

v.

HENRY YUNICK, AS PROPRIETOR OF SMOKEY'S AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Knauer v. Barnett, 360 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 1978)
  …SUNDBERG, Justice. This cause is a petition for writ of certio-rari to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, reported at 336 So. 2d 1213, which is alleged to be in conflict with In re McCollum’s Estate, 88 So. 2d 537 (Fla.1956) and Taylor v. Taylor, 279 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).1 Conflict is predicated upon the issue of whether [*401] the paternity of a child who has been legitimatized by both a written, attested acknowledgment and intermarriage of his par…
• State of Fla. ex rel. Horace E. Hill v. Hearn, 99 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 1957)
  …to prevent a court of competent jurisdiction from enforcing by way of contempt proceedings an outstanding and unrevoked order of the court involved. One aspect of this matter was previously before this court. See In re McCollum’s Estate, Fla.1956, 88 So. 2d 537. It appears from the record now here that on December 18, 1953, the respondent Hearn, as County Judge, entered an order by which he decided that one Kenneth Mc-Collum was the illegitimate son of Samuel McCollum, deceased. This order concluded that…
• Barnett v. Barnett, 336 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …which it did in order that the husband be allowed to contest the fatherhood of the child as we will subsequently point out. We disagree with the Fourth District Court’s construction of the statute. Appellees also rely upon In re McCollum’s Estate, 88 So. 2d 537 (Fla.1956), in support of their contention that the fact of paternity must be proved. In the Supreme Court’s opinion in McCollum, it referred to In Re Horne’s Estate, 149 Fla. 710, 7 So. 2d 13 (1942), and Wall v. Altobello, 49 So. 2d 532 (Fla.1950),…

Authorities Cited

• Becksted v. Riverside Bank OF Miami, 85 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 1956)
• Carls Mkts., Inc. v. Leonard, 73 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 1954)
• Kessler v. Thomas Corp., 73 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 1954)