CURTIS TAYLOR, DONNELLY ADVERTISING CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
MABEL LEE CRAIG AND SIDNEY PAUL CRAIG, HER HUSBAND, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1978-01-10
No. 76-2294
Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ.
354 So. 2d 105 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants challenge the amount of damages awarded in a personal injury case. The trial court denied a motion for a new trial or a remittitur, which decision indicates that the trial court did not feel that the verdict was excessive or such as to shock the judicial conscience.

We have examined the record and the evidence and considered the arguments and case law urged. It is our view that the damages awarded were within reasonable limits and amply justified by the evidence at trial. We are unable to determine any legal basis whereby this court would be entitled to disturb the jury’s decision to the amount of damages. The defendants, having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the verdict and judgment based thereon are affirmed. See Cleere v. Humphreys, 280 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); St. Vincent’s Hospital, Incorporated v. Crouch, 292 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Popham v. Baker, 309 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Diaz v. Sears, 475 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
    …rial because of alleged confusing instructions and inadequate damage award. Middelveen v. Sibson Realty, Inc., 417 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); American National Bank of Jacksonville v. Norris, 368 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Taylor v. Craig, 354 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Popham v. Baker, 309 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). We also find no error in the trial court’s exercising its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion to interview the jurors. Cummings v. Sine, 404 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981);…
  • Leibiski v. The Concord Fla., Inc., 358 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Stark v. Vazquez, 168 So. 2d 140 (Fla.1964); Metropolitan Dade County v. Espinosa, 344 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Taylor v. Craig, 354 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw