STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,

v.

CECIL CLYDE DOTSON, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Valentino DeGEORGE v. State, 358 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
  …ction 810.011(1) and Section 810.01) are sufficiently informative to those of common understanding. The constitutionality of 810.02, Florida Statutes (1975), is not in question. Riddle v. State, 345 So. 2d 1073 (Fla.1977), also see Simmons v. State, 354 So. 2d 1211 (Fla.1978). Section 810.02 of the Florida Statutes (1975) provides: “810.02 Burglars- “(1) ‘Burglary’ means entering and remaining in a structure or a conveyance with the intent to commit an offense therein, unless the premises are at the time op…
• Cnty. OF Seminole v. The Honorable Tom Waddell, Jr., 382 So. 2d 357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …for capital cases in 1973 1, we view the respondents’ constitutional attack on Section 925.036 as merely colorable, rather than substantial, and therefore retain jurisdiction. See State v. Opitz, 357 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Simmons v. State, 354 So. 2d 1211 (Fla.1978). Moreover, the trial judge in this case did not directly pass on the validity of the statute or construe the state or federal constitution in regard to this issue. See Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution. The respondents argue, not w…
• Daytona Beach Racing & Recreational Facilities Dist. & Int'l Speedway Corp. v. Volusia Cnty., 355 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …e jurisdiction of appeals from circuit court judgments initially passing on the validity of a state statute, including judgments that necessarily and inherently pass on such questions. Article V, Section 3, Constitution of Florida; Simmons v. State, 354 So. 2d 1211 (Fla.1978). Appellees properly called the jurisdictional question to our attention but urge that the constitutionality of the 1973 repealing act has been determined or is otherwise so lacking in substance that it does not impede our exercise of juri…