JIMMY LEE SYKES, PETITIONER,

v.

LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Fickle v. Adkins, 394 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …A 1979); (2) to the limited extent that it determined matters noticed for hearing and properly before the court, it was entered without providing the parties a full and fair opportunity to be heard and present evidence, Christiansen v. Christiansen, 354 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Pelle v. Diners Club, 287 So. 2d 737 (Fla.3d DCA 1974). We reject Adkins’ contention that the trial court’s order was agreed to by Fickle, since we will not imply such an agreement from a party’s silence in response to a court’s…
• Green v. Green's Baptist Temple, Inc., 407 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …the final judgment under review and remand the cause for a trial at which the parties are to be afforded a full and fair opportunity to be heard and present evidence. Fickle v. Adkins, 394 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Christiansen v. Christiansen, 354 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Pelle v. Diners Club, 287 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Reversed and remanded.…
• Bolton v. Bolton, 462 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
  …enying his petition for modification on the ground that the denial of the petition without an evidentiary hearing violated the husband’s due process rights. We agree. Fickle v. Adkins, 394 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Christiansen v. Christiansen, 354 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Accordingly, we reverse with directions that the trial judge conduct a hearing, upon due notice to both parties, on the husband’s petition for modification and permit the parties at that hearing to produce such evidence as they…