FLORIDA EXPRESS, INC., F/K/A SCHREIBER EXPRESS, INC., PETITIONER,

v.

PAULA F. HAWKINS ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• Hardwick v. State, 521 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 1988)
  …o find in mitigation that he was impaired through drug or alcohol abuse. We agree that such evidence must be considered in mitigation, Fead v. State, 512 So. 2d 176, 178 (Fla.1987); Cannady v. State, 427 So. 2d 723, 731 (Fla.1983); Buckrem v. State, 355 So. 2d 111, 113-14 (Fla.1978), especially where established by uncontroverted factual evidence in the record. Brannen v. State, 94 Fla. 656, 661-62, 114 So. 429 (1927); Merrill Stevens Dry Dock Co. v. G & J Investments Corp., Inc., 506 So. 2d 30, 32 (Fla. 3d D…
• Jackson v. State, 575 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 1991)
  …icited only from a witness who is not equally available to the state. A witness is not equally available when there is a special relationship between the defendant and the witness. State v. Michaels, 454 So. 2d 560, 562 (Fla.1984); Buckrem v. State, 355 So. 2d 111, 112 (Fla.1978); see also Brown v. State, 524 So. 2d 730, 731 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Romero v. State, 435 So. 2d 318, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), review denied, 447 So. 2d 888 (Fla.1984); Jenkins v. State, 317 So. 2d 90, 91 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). In Buckr…
• Buford v. State, 403 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 1981)
  …f Florida conforms to the decision rendered in Lockett v. Ohio. In several cases this Court has recognized the relevance of non-enumerated mitigating circumstances and utilized them in determining the propriety of the sentence. See Buckrem v. State, 355 So. 2d 111 (Fla.1978); McCaskill v. State, 344 So. 2d 1276 (Fla.1977); Messer v. State, 330 So. 2d 137 (Fla.1976); Meeks v. State, 336 So. 2d 1142 (Fla.1976); Jones v. State, 332 So. 2d 615 (Fla.1976); Chambers v. State, 339 So. 2d 204 (Fla.1976); Halliwell v.…