BRIAN FRANCIS HIGGINS, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE O. CAMPBELL, SOMETIMES KNOWN AS GERRY ORA CAMPBELL, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1956-03-07
TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and HOBSON, ROBERTS and BUFORD, JJ., concur.
89 So. 2d 246 Florida Supreme Court (1956) Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of the companion case of Brailsford v. Campbell, Fla., 89 So. 2d 241. No other reversible error has been discovered in the point peculiar to this case.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and HOBSON, ROBERTS and BUFORD, JJ., concur.

Dissent
THOMAS and THORNAL, JJ.,

THOMAS and THORNAL, JJ.,

dissent for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in the companion case of Brails-ford v. Campbell.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ratley v. Batchelor, 599 So. 2d 1298 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
    …n for whom he was not employed, to move the modular home, absent an express statutory provision authorizing such transfer, NTC of America, Inc., could not validly transfer this permit to Mr. Batchelor. See Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. King, 89 So. 2d 246 (Fla.1956). This interpretation of these statutes is consistent with Department of Transportation rule 14-26.007, Florida Administrative Code, which states that oversize permits are granted with the specific understanding that the permittee shall…
  • van Arsdale v. King, 149 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 1963)
    …has the power to investigate and decide the question of abandonment because of dormancy in a certificate or stock transfer proceeding. We have so held when a certificate was being transferred. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. King et al., Fla., 89 So. 2d 246. The respondent Commission further deviated from the essential requirements of law when it concluded that it had the power to place a partial restriction for dormancy against the subject certificate. It should be recalled that the restriction was f…
  • State v. King, 93 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1957)
    …erations, and to revoke the rule of the commission, numbered 61, or to show cause for their failure to comply with the writ. This action was an aftermath of the litigation we concluded by our opinion in Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co. v. King, Fla., 89 So. 2d 246, by which we quashed an order of the commission that a certificate of public convenience and necessity held by L. H. Sims be cancelled and reissued to Rockana Carriers, Inc. The matter comes to us again on the motions of the commission and Rockana…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw