CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN C. GIRTMAN, AS GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND PROPERTY OF LEWIS R. SNYDER, APPELLEE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
JOHN C. GIRTMAN, AS GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND PROPERTY OF LEWIS R. SNYDER, APPELLEE
89 So. 2d 318
Florida Supreme Court (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, and THOMAS, HOBSON and BUFORD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Odham v. Foremost Dairies, Inc., 128 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 1961)…o., Fla.App.1960, 123 So. 2d 353; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, Sect. 307 (1955). . Miami Homo Milk Producers Ass’n v. Milk Control Board, 1936, 124 Fla. 797, 169 So. 541; Alderman v. Puritan Dairy, 1941, 146 Fla. 345, 1 So. 2d 177; Shiver v. Lee, Fla.1956, 89 So. 2d 318. . 1 Fla.Jur., Administrative Law, Section 234 (1955). Riley v. Lawson, 1932, 106 Fla. 521, 143 So. 619. . Davis, Administrative Law (1951), para. 190 contains an excellent dissertation on this subject.- . Order of Railway Conductors of America v…
-
Borden Co. v. Odham, 121 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 1959)…ree in toto does not support this contention. In addition to what has been said, we could rest the answer to this question on what was said in Miami Home Milk Producers’ Ass’n v. Milk Control Board, 124 Fla. 797, 169 So. 541 and Shiver v. Lee, Fla., 89 So. 2d 318. These cases deal with the broad powers vested in the Commission under the police power. Chapter 501, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., has to do with this very point and there is no showing that the action of the Commission was unreasonable or arbitrary. A…1 / 2
-
Nat'l Dairy Prods. Corp. v. Odham, 121 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 1959)…s made and it is not shown that appellant objected at the time or made any showing that it was injured by the order complained of. At best the Commission was exercising a permissive power delegated to it by the legislature. Shiver v. Lee, Fla.1956, 89 So. 2d 318. No abuse of discretion is shown so the order of the chancellor denying petition for certiorari must be, and is hereby, affirmed. Affirmed. TERRELL, HOBSON, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur. THOMAS, C. J., dissents.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence