JAMES R. MCMANNUS, APPELLANT,
v.
MIDLAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC., AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AND FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
JAMES R. MCMANNUS, APPELLANT,
MIDLAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC., AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AND FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
89 So. 2d 349
Florida Supreme Court (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 31 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that -it is-manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need! no further argument; • - It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to 'affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
DREW, C. J., THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., and ROWE, Associate Justice, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S. Baptist Hosp. of Fla., Inc. v. TAX Assessor, 30 Fla. Supp. 45 (Duval Cty. Cir. Ct. 1968)…exemption on the speedway. The assessor’s denial was upheld by the circuit court and affirmed by the District Court. In granting certiorari, the Supreme Court noted that in the bond validation proceedings considered by the court, Justice O’Connell (89 So. 2d 349, 351) in examining “public purpose”, had said — “The public purpose here seems to be predominate and the private benefit and gain to be incidental.” The court also cited State v. Board of Control, 66 So. 2d 209, where it had said — The mere fact t…