JOHN R. MCCAFFEREY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHN R. MCCAFFEREY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
89 So. 2d 607
Florida Supreme Court (1956)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
DREW, C. J., and TERRELL, O’CONNELL and BUFORD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
State v. Miami Beach Redev. Agency, 392 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 1980)…“not intended to inhibit governmental entities from entering into contracts for current governmental needs and requirements when done in due course of then authorized budgetary administration of public affairs.” E. g., State v. County of Palm Beach, 89 So. 2d 607, 609 (Fla.1956). This Court very early held that article IX, section 6 of the Constitution of 1885 did not require a referendum when bonds were proposed to be sold to finance construction of a public works project that would be self-liquidating, th…
-
Daniels v. State Rd. Dep't of Fla., 170 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 1964)…d, we shall discuss by way of caveat; Cf. Great Northern Railroad Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co., 287 U.S. 358, 53 S.Ct. 145, 77 L.Ed. 360, 85 A.L.R. 254. See also special concurring opinion of Thornal, J. in State v. County of Palm Beach, Fla., 89 So. 2d 607. The other has been presented here by the appellants but does not appear to have been properly presented to the lower court. Since we think that both are of importance to the Bench and the Bar of this state, as well as to the litigants in this case,…
-
State v. Cnty. OF Dade, 234 So. 2d 651 (Fla. 1970)…Posey v. Wakulla County, 148 Fla. 115, 3 So. 2d 799 (1941); State v. Lafayette County, 55 So. 2d 799 (Fla.1952) ; State v. Sumter County, 60 So. 2d 529 (Fla.1952) ; State v. St. Johns County, 60 So. 2d 530 (Fla.1952) ; State v. County of Palm Beach, 89 So. 2d 607 (Fla.1956) ; State v. County of Dade, 92 So. 2d 186 (Fla.1957); State v. County of Santa Rosa, 105 So. 2d 365 (Fla.1958) ; State v. Lee County, 121 So. 2d 788 (Fla.1960); Kearney v. County of St. Lucie, 126 So. 2d 140 (Fla.1961). . Mize v. County o…1 / 3
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence