E. S. BUSH

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• Russell House Movers, Inc. v. Nolin, 210 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 1968)
  …so subsequently be reinjured. Our Court has commented that one who in an exemplary spirit makes an honest effort to continue to earn a livelihood, regardless of his injury, should not be penalized. Brewer v. Pan American Airways, Inc., 156 Fla. 812, 24 So. 2d 521. See also, Tingle v. Board of County Commissioners (Fla.), 174 So. 2d 1, 2. Both the Petitioners and Cross-Petitioner contend there is no evidence or other justification in the case for a 50% apportionment. In their brief the Petitioners state: “A…
• Muller v. Maxcy, 74 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 1954)
  …t of a pending motion to dismiss has been involved in cases decided under the applicable rules, the decision has turned upon other points, and there does not appear to have been a full consideration of the provisions of the rules. Storm v. Houghton, 156 Fla. 793, 24 So. 2d 519; Rountree v. Rountree, Fla., 72 So. 2d 794. So far as we are informed by the record, the plaintiffs made no effort to invoke a ruling by the court as to the sufficiency of the “defense in law” contained in the answers, either prior t…
• Rountree v. Rountree, 72 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 1954)
  …Cole, who was represented by counsel of record, had filed answers in the cause. Aside from the matter of entry of the above decree for failure to take testimony, while yet was pending and,undis-posed of a motion to dismiss (see Storm v. Floughton, 156 Fla. 793, 24 So. 2d 519), we think it was clearly error to determine the cause was at issue before either an answer had been.filed or a decree pro confesso had been entered as to each of the defendants. The defendants Mamie Rountree and Nina Parnell Cole wer…