M & H FOODS, INC., D/B/A COTTON'S MIN-A-MART, NO. 6 AND HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONERS,

v.

JANET LEE WILLIS, ETC., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Smith v. State, 7 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 2009)
  …ion of the words used, which occurred in contexts in which their normal lexicographical meanings would be illogical and meaningless. See Daniels v. State, 381 So. 2d 707, 709-10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), aff'd, 389 So. 2d 631 (Fla.1980); Slater v. State, 356 So. 2d 69, 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Accordingly, we find this claim not preserved for appellate review and to be without merit. Admission of Police Report Smith claims that the trial court erred when it admitted into evidence a police report regarding Domini…
• Daniels v. State, 381 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …pose of Officer McClain’s testimony. The jury was also properly advised regarding their function in assessing the testimony.6 Appellant Daniels’ fourth point7 has been resolved contrary to his contentions by this court’s opinion in Slater v. State, 356 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) wherein we stated: “ * * * [Ajppellant contends that the trial judge committed reversible error when permitting a police officer, over the objection of the defendant, to be qualified as an expert witness regarding street languag…
• Pugh v. State, 971 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …ning from those in the community who use the term; the speakers have tacitly agreed on a meaning. Based on his street experience, the undercover officer testified as an expert witness “regarding street language in the drug culture.” Slater v. State, 356 So. 2d 69, 70 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); see Daniels v. State, 381 So. 2d 707, 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979) (quoting Slater); Howard v. State, 738 So. 2d 372, 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (holding that detective qualified as expert in “street slang” based on her “heritage as…