ETHEL LEE BRYANT AND CLYDE BRYANT, PETITIONERS,
v.
THE HONORABLE GEORGE W. TEDDER AND THE HONORABLE STANTON S. KAPLAN, CIRCUIT JUDGES OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, RESPONDENTS
ETHEL LEE BRYANT AND CLYDE BRYANT, PETITIONERS,
THE HONORABLE GEORGE W. TEDDER AND THE HONORABLE STANTON S. KAPLAN, CIRCUIT JUDGES OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, RESPONDENTS
356 So. 2d 379
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1978)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The issue involved in this cause is exactly the same as was decided in Morales v. Moore, 356 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Accordingly, we hereby exercise our discretion to treat the suggestion for writ of prohibition as a petition for writ of certiorari. For the reasons set out in Morales, the petition is granted; and the order denying the petitioner’s motion to strike is quashed, with directions that an order be entered excluding podiatrists from the list of prospective members of the medical mediation panel.
ALDERMAN, C. J., and ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Morales v. The Honorable John H. Moore, 356 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)