PAULETTE JONES, A/K/A BERTHA PAULETTE ATKINS, A/K/A PAULETT JONES, A/K/A CATHY PERTERS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1978-03-28
Nos. 77-1473, 77-1474 and 77-1476
Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
356 So. 2d 920 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Croteau v. State, 334 So. 2d 577 (Fla.1976); Bernhardt v. State, 288 So. 2d 490 (Fla.1974); Wheeler v. State, 344 So. 2d 630 (Fla.2d DCA 1977), and Randolph v. State, 292 So. 2d 374 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Royer v. State, 389 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
    …ohnson testified again that the defendant took the key from his pocket to open the case, and testified that the defendant had not been requested to empty his pockets until after he was arrested, after the suitcases had been opened. . State v. Wise, 356 So. 2d 920 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1978); Cockerham v. State, 237 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); James v. State, 223 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). . The establishment of such a rule of law would operate to permit a person, by purposely and intentionally giving his con…
  • M. J. v. State, 399 So. 2d 996 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
    …la. 1st DCA 1977). Here, there was a demand to produce the cannabis before its actual production. Hence, there was a search. Of course, if the appellant initiated or invited the search, he could not validly object to that search. See State v. Wise, 356 So. 2d 920, 921 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). In this respect, the State argues that just before the appellant produced the cannabis cigarette, he invited a search by indicating that Mr. Black could search him. Accepting this argument, however, still leaves the question…
  • Johnson v. State, 386 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
    …n an emergency. Long v. State, 310 So. 2d 35 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); Gilbert v. State, 289 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). See also State v. Hetzko, 283 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). A warrantless search can also be validated by consent. State v. Wise, 356 So. 2d 920 (Fla.2d DCA 1978). When a defendant has not only consented to the search but has actually invited the search, the defendant cannot thereafter validly object to either the search or the seizure of items during the search. Id.; State v. Patterson, 252…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw