CONRAD W. RAFIELD, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
DOUGLAS NEAL BENHAM, CHRISTINE BOLLONG AND HANS JURGENS BOLLONG D/B/A CHRISTINE'S HOUSE OF FLOWERS, TELEFLORA LEASING, A DIVISION OF TELEFLORA DELIVERY SERVICE, INC., AND LEASE PLAN, INC. AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLEES
CONRAD W. RAFIELD, JR., APPELLANT,
DOUGLAS NEAL BENHAM, CHRISTINE BOLLONG AND HANS JURGENS BOLLONG D/B/A CHRISTINE'S HOUSE OF FLOWERS, TELEFLORA LEASING, A DIVISION OF TELEFLORA DELIVERY SERVICE, INC., AND LEASE PLAN, INC. AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLEES
356 So. 2d 1289
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Castaldo v. Singapore, J. F., Inc., 258 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) and cases cited therein.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pierce v. Progressive Am. Ins. Co., 582 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…e, Jr. v. Walt Disney World Co., 350 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Metropolitan Dade County Transit Authority v. Espinosa, 344 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 352 So. 2d 173 (Fla.1977). . See Rautbord v. Industrial Avenue Realties, Ltd., 356 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).…
-
Putnam v. Eaton Constr. Co., 535 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)…ors, Inc. (Reteneller’s employers and owners of the pursuit vehicle). We must view the record and all inferences in a light most favorable to the appellants. Landers v. Milton, 370 So. 2d 368 (Fla.1979); Rautbord v. Industrial Avenue Realties, Ltd., 356 So. 2d 1289, 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Purifoy v. Burlingame, 313 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Here, there appears to be sufficient controverted facts and circum [*617] stances to merit submission of the case to a jury. Burroughs Corporation v. American Drugg…
-
Central States v. Fla. Soc'y OF Pathologists, 824 So. 2d 935 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…ion to pay a professional component fee, the lower court erred in entering judgment for the pathologists on this issue. Reading the record in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, see Rautbord v. Industrial Avenue Realties, [*941] Ltd., 356 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), the pathologists have not shown themselves entitled to judgment on either issue, or to an injunction. Accordingly, the final summary judgment is REVERSED. SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ„ concur. . In Fasig, a previous appeal in this ca…
Authorities Cited
- Castaldo v. Singapore, 258 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)