NORTH AMERICAN MORTGAGE INVESTORS, A MASSACHUSETTS BUSINESS TRUST, APPELLANTS,
v.
CAPE SAN BLAS JOINT VENTURE, A GEORGIA PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., APPELLEE
NORTH AMERICAN MORTGAGE INVESTORS, A MASSACHUSETTS BUSINESS TRUST, APPELLANTS,
CAPE SAN BLAS JOINT VENTURE, A GEORGIA PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., APPELLEE
357 So. 2d 416
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1977)
Caution
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We approve and adopt the conclusions and reasons set forth in the final judgment appealed which identifies and discusses all the issues presented.
The judgment is affirmed.
MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
McCREARY v. State, 371 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1979)…of vehicular homicide was to decrease the possible penalty for manslaughter caused by the operation of a motor vehicle but not to change the standard of proof required for conviction. The reasoning of the district court of appeal in State v. Young, 357 So. 2d 416, 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), is correct on this point: The vehicular homicide statute was originally enacted as Chapter 74-383, Section 16, Laws of Florida. Prior to its enactment, prosecution of those negligently causing the death of another by operat…
-
Cont'l Mortg. Invs. v. Sailboat KEY, Inc., 395 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 1981)…It is so ordered. ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. . Jurisdiction vested under article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution (1972), because of the conflict with North Am. Mtg. Investors v. Cape San Blas Joint Venture, 357 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). This conflict issue was resolved by our decision in North Am. Mtg. Investors v. Cape San Blas Joint Venture, 378 So. 2d 287 (Fla.1979). . This firm was referred to as Continental Ad-visors by the court below. 354 So. 2d 67, 69-…
-
Littman v. Commercial Bank & Tr. Co., 425 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…tutory provisions are irreconcilable, however, the general rule is that specific statutes on a subject take precedence over another statute covering the same subject in general terms. Bryan v. Landis, 106 Fla. 19, 142 So. 650 (1932); State v. Young, 357 So. 2d 416 (Fla.2d DCA 1978), rev’d on other grounds, 371 So. 2d 1029 (Fla.1979). Applying these principles to the instant case, we initially observe that many of the provisions of the UCC interact, and although section 679.311 states that a “debtor’s rights…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence