MAYNARD DAVID SELVOG, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Maynard David Selvog appealed an order on his motion for jail credit time under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The appellate court reversed and remanded because the postconviction court failed to attach record support for its factual findings regarding jail credit calculations in two criminal cases.
The appellate court reversed the postconviction court's order and remanded because the postconviction court failed to attach record portions supporting its factual findings. On remand, if the court again denies the claims, it must attach those record portions that conclusively refute the claims.
[1] A court ruling on a motion for jail credit time under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) must attach record support if it denies the motion.
[2] A defendant is entitled to jail credit for time spent in county jail awaiting trial or sentencing.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“However, the postconviction court failed to provide any record attachments in support of its findings. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.”
Establishes the court's basis for reversal—the lack of record support for the postconviction court's factual findings.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSelvog sought 117 days of jail credit for time spent in county jail from October 1, 2004, to January 25, 2005, across two cases (CF04-000361-XX and CF…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Record Attachments cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Maynard David Selvog appeals the order ruling on his motion for jail credit time filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
In his motion, Selvog claims entitlement to a total of 117 days of jail credit for time spent in the county jail from October 1, 2004, to January 25, 2005, in cases CF04-000361-XX and CF04-006955-XX. In addressing Selvog’s claims, the postconviction court found that in case CF04-000361-XX, Selvog was in county jail from January 20, 2004, to February 24, 2004, from April 5, 2004, to May 14, 2004, and from October 2, 2004, to January 25, 2005, thereby entitling Selvog to 192 days’ jail credit in case CF04-000361-XX. Because Selvog had received 196 days’ jail credit, the postconviction court denied his request for additional jail credit. As to case CF04-006955-XX, the postconviction court found that Selvog was in county jail from October 2, 2004, to January 25, 2005, thereby entitling Selvog to 116 days’ jail credit. Because Selvog received only 115 days’ jail credit, the postconviction court awarded Selvog one additional day of jail credit.
However, the postconviction court failed to provide any record attachments in support of its findings. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings. On remand, if the postconviction court again denies the claims, it shall attach those portions of the record that conclusively refute the claims. See McPherson v. State, 750 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
STRINGER, YILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.