LINDA S. MCWHORTER, APPELLANT,

v.

MARC S. MCWHORTER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Davidson Joel James v. State, 453 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 1984)
  …y, there was no showing that the tape recording existed, was suppressed, was material, or was exculpatory. The nonproduction of the tape did not prejudice James,3 and the trial court did not err in refusing to grant sanctions. Sobel; Weise v. State, 357 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). As his second point on appeal James claims that the trial court erred in allowing an expert to use parole reports written by James as known examples of his handwriting. The state did not publish these reports to the jury and di…
• State v. Sobel, 363 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 1978)
  …istrict Court of Appeal, Fourth District, in Ludwick v. State, supra, held that the mere fact that a taped recording which may have been utilized in evidence was destroyed does not require automatic reversal. [*328] Most recently, in Wiese v. State, 357 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), opinion filed April 18, 1978, which involved destruction of a tape recording of a conversation between the police and an accomplice of the defendant, the Fourth District affirmed the defendant’s conviction and held that the stat…
• Budman v. State, 362 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …ing. Accordingly, we have concluded that appellant’s first point on appeal is without merit. Moore v. Illinois, 408 U.S. 786, 92 S.Ct. 2562, 33 L.Ed.2d 706 (1972); Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); Wiese v. State, 357 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 4th DCA, opinion filed April 18, 1978); cf. Mitchell v. State, 358 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978) (finding of materiality); Ludwick v. State, 336 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) (inadequate record to demonstrate prejudice); and Hernandez v. Stat…