ROBERT A. PAFFY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1978-03-28
No. 76-1260
CROSS, DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
358 So. 2d 32 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1978) Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED on authority of Moore v. State, 352 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

CROSS, DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Paffy, 369 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1979)
    …ed determines whether an offense is a misdemeanor or a felony, and where value or amount is not in dispute, must the court instruct the jury on the lesser offense based on lesser values or amounts than that proved? Because the decision in this case (358 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)) is in conflict with Gilford v. State, 313 So. 2d 729 (Fla.1975), we exercise our jurisdiction under article Y, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and answer the question in the negative. A person other than the respondent (…
  • Isley v. Reubin O'D. Askew, 372 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1979)
    …PER CURIAM. This cause is before the court on appeal from a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, which construed a provision of the state constitution. Isley v. Askew, 358 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla.Const. The district court’s decision was rendered upon the filing of an original petition there, seeking a “rule to show cause,” testing the authority of the governor to suspend the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw