RONALD DANCY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RONALD DANCY, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
358 So. 2d 60
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This appeal has been accepted by this court as a belated appeal pursuant to Baggett v. Wainwright, 229 So. 2d 239 (Fla.1969). The point presented urges error upon the admission of testimony which indicated defendant’s involvement in a prior crime. We hold that the testimony met the test of relevancy set forth by the Supreme Court of Florida in Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla.1959). See also Dempsey v. State, 238 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ostene Francois v. Harris, 366 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…inference of fraud or collusion. But since the facts in Young, if anything, more strongly supported the conclusion that the plaintiff’s injuries were feigned than do those involved in this case, it is therefore all the more clear that, as stated at 358 So. 2d 60: “. . . The facts herein do not rise to the level of fraud or collusion as to require the court to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims as an outrageous misuse of the system of justice.” The defendants rely heavily upon Horjales v. Loeb, 291 So. 2d 92 (…
Authorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 1959)
- Baggett v. Louie L. Wainwright, 229 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 1969)
- Dempsey v. State, 238 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)