CLEVELAND RICHBOURG, JR.,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
CLEVELAND RICHBOURG, JR.,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
157 Fla. 175
Florida Supreme Court (1946)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 25 So. 2d 280
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
CHAPMAN, C. J., BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. Exerdell B. Martin and Albert C. Martin, 186 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 1966)…ring to a married woman the right to convey and mortgage her separate real property was neutralized by the later provision that she could do so if her husband joined in the instrument, a subject on which we animadverted in Miller v. Phillips et vir, 157 Fla. 175, 25 So. 2d 194. But a study of the act and its purpose seems to dispel the thought. The original law was enacted by the Legislative Council of the Territory of Florida in 1835. Before that, in 1824, the Legislative Council had adopted an act intende…
-
Josie E. Frazier v. Hart, 140 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)…it was not signed by the husband. The emphasized proviso in Sec. 708.08, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., set out supra, requires, as a prerequisite to the validity of an instrument such as this, that the husband execute the instrument. Miller v. Phillips, 1946, 157 Fla. 175, 25 So. 2d 194. Finding no error in the judgment appealed, the same is hereby affirmed. Affirmed. ALLEN and SMITH, JJ., concur.…