BOBBY LEE THOMAS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BOBBY LEE THOMAS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
358 So. 2d 114
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
On this appeal of an order revoking probation, the defendant probationer urges that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence testimony which established that the defendant had committed several offenses other than the violation charged in the affidavit of violation of probation. The record reveals that the other offenses which were proved by the testimony were related to the offense charged in the affidavit and were admissible into evidence under the rules stated in Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla.1959).
An additional point questioning the sufficiency of the proof of the violation charged in the affidavit does not present reversible error upon the holding in Randolph v. State, 292 So. 2d 374 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Byrd v. State, 390 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…shows that the offense of grand theft was sufficiently demonstrated so as to satisfy the conscience of the court that the defendant materially violated the terms of his probation. Randolph v. State, 292 So. 2d 374 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); Thomas v. State, 358 So. 2d 114 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). Accordingly, we affirm the order revoking the defendant’s probation, except as modified by our reversal of that ground revoking the defendant’s probation for non-payment of costs of supervision. Affirmed as modified.…
Authorities Cited
- Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 1959)
- Randolph v. State, 292 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)