COTTON STATES MUTUAL INS. CO., PHILLIP FOWLER AND DIANE FOWLER, APPELLANTS,

v.

JEANNE H. TREVETHAN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• City OF Coral Gables v. Prats, 502 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …claim by the amount the jury found attributable to Mr. Prat’s negligence. Mrs. Prats’ loss of consortium claim is derivative: her claim exists only in relation to her husband’s claim, Gates v. Foley, 247 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1971); Hamm v. City of Milton, 358 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), and she is not entitled to obtain a greater recovery than her husband received. The other points raised by appellees regarding Mrs. Prats’ loss of consortium claim lack merit. We therefore reverse that portion of the final judgm…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Trevethan, 390 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …hat action resulted in a verdict for Tre-vethan for $525,000. Judgment was entered thereon against appellant for its poli [*725] cy limits of $100,000, and against the Fowl-ers for the remaining $425,000. That judgment was appealed and was affirmed, 358 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. den. 364 So. 2d 883 (1978), prior to the creation of this court. Appellee then commenced these proceedings against appellant insurer,1 contending that the insurer had acted in bad faith in refusing to settle the original claim…
• Hannabass v. Fla. Home Ins. Co., 412 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
  …n the damages they incurred as Rhonda’s parents. The court should reduce any damages awarded to them at the new trial by 50% in accordance with the jury’s prior verdict because Rhonda’s negligence must be imputed to them. See Hamm v. City of Milton, 358 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). We affirm the judgment of $2,000 for Rhonda. RYDER and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.…