PHYLLIS FRIEDSON DOLLINGER, APPELLANT,

v.

HOWARD IRWIN DOLLINGER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• The Bd. OF Trs. OF the Internal Improvement Tr. Fund OF the State of Fla. v. Mobil OIL Corp., 455 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …(Fla.1952), Ullendorff v. Brown 156 Fla. 655, 24 So. 2d 37, 39-40 (1945), Martinez v. Martinez, 153 Fla. 753,15 So. 2d 842 (1943), DiProspero v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co., 400 So. 2d 177, 179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Gehl, 358 So. 2d 228, 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), Hogan v. Millican, 209 So. 2d 716, 718 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968), and Crosley Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., 122 F. 2d 925 (3d Cir.1941), the court which first attempted to exercise jurisdiction had subject matter jurisdiction. See als…
• Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. FRY, 693 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …ants, the historical law of Florida has been that the power to entertain the action attaches exclusively to that court which first exercised jurisdiction over the matter. Benedict v. Foster, 300 So. 2d 8, 10 (Fla.1974); Royal Globe Ins. Co. v. Gehl, 358 So. 2d 228, 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Hogan v. Millican, 209 So. 2d 716, 718 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968); Hunt v. Ganaway, 180 So. 2d 495, 496-97 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965), cert. denied, 188 So. 2d 806 (Fla.1966); Blake v. Blake, 172 So. 2d 9, 10 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied,…
• Hirsch v. Margaret DiGAETANO, M.D., 732 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
  …tablished law of Florida that where two courts have concurrent jurisdiction of a cause of action, the first court to exercise jurisdiction has [*1178] the exclusive right to hear all issues or questions arising in the case. Royal Globe Ins. v. Gehl, 358 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); see also Florida Crushed Stone Co. v. Travelers Indem. Co., 632 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (reversing summary judgment where lower court refused to stay state action involving same parties and similar issues in previously fil…

Authorities Cited

• Houston R. White v. White, 296 So. 2d 619 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
• Dwyer v. Dwyer, 327 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
• Bell v. Bell, 307 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)