DAVID DEROSA, APPELLANT,
v.
MELISSA S. DEROSA, APPELLEE
DAVID DEROSA, APPELLANT,
MELISSA S. DEROSA, APPELLEE
924 So. 2d 965
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, David DeRosa, appeals from the final judgment of dissolution of marriage in which the trial court found that appellee, Melissa S. DeRosa, was entitled to attorney’s fees and costs. Prior to the entry of the judgment, the parties stipulated that entitlement to fees would be determined at a separate hearing. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in adjudging appellee’s entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs. Appellee agrees and states that the finding of entitlement was premature. Based upon this confession of error, we reverse and remand for a hearing on appellee’s entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs.
Reversed and Remanded For Further Proceedings.
SHAHOOD, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
I.Z. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families & Guardian Ad Litem Program, 967 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…ing whether the trial court erred in placing the child in a permanent guardianship and in terminating protective supervision, this court looks at whether the statutory factors detailed above have been met. See J.H. v. Dep’t of Children and Families, 924 So. 2d 965, 966 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). In the final order granting DCF’s motion to place the child in permanent guardianship and terminating protective supervision, the trial court determined that all the factors listed above had been met. Further, the trial co…