GEORGE W. GREEN

v.

C. J. EARLEY, AS TRUSTEE AT ALS.

Citator

Cited By

• Hollywood, Inc. v. City OF Hollywood, 321 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 1975)
  …ch, supra. The evidence, additionally, had a direct bearing on the question of acceptance of dedication. The acceptance of a dedication may be by formal action of the proper authorities or it may be by public user. Robinson v. Town of Riviera, 1946, 157 Fla. 194, 25 So. 2d 277 “To reiterate, the excluded evidence directly related to the issue of the dedica [*69] tor’s intention to dedicate and the mode and manner of the acceptance of such dedication as to both Block 205 and Block C. The City, therefore, sh…
• City OF Hollywood v. Zinkil, 283 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)
  …h, supra. The evidence, additionally, had a direct bearing on the question of acceptance of dedication. The acceptance of a dedication may be by formal action of the proper authorities5 or it may be by public user. Robinson v. Town of Riviera, 1946, 157 Fla. 194, 25 So. 2d 277; Laube v. City of Stuart, Fla.App.1958, 107 So. 2d 757; 10 Fla.Jur. Dedication § 18, footnote. As the late Justice Terrell pointed out in City of Miami v. Jansik, Fla.1956, 89 So. 2d 644, 645: “This court is committed to the doctrine…
• Abe Stein and Alice N. Stein v. Darby, 114 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)
  …vided by law. If no such amendment is filed by plaintiffs within the time herein limited, the order of dismissal with prejudice as to defendant Seaboard shall stand affirmed. STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD, JJ., concur. . Robinson v. Town of Riviera, 157 Fla. 194, 25 So. 2d 277; Kirkland v. City of Tampa, 75 Fla. 271, 78 So. 17. . Couture v. Dade County, 93 Fla. 342, 112 So. 75. . Rule 1.8(d), F.R.C.P., 30 F.S.A.; Moskovits v. Moskovits, Fla.App.1959, 112 So. 2d 875; Chambers v. Chambers, Fla.App.1958, 102…