JAMES LUTHER TRUMBLE, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES LUTHER TRUMBLE, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
358 So. 2d 895
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant entered a plea of nolo conten-dere without reserving the right to appeal. Therefore, we dismiss his appeal. Section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes (1977).
HOBSON, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. Johnson, 386 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)…f-supporting. The husband argues that because it does not appear that the former wife gave up any property rights in exchange for the alimony, this obligation is modifiable. Coffin v. Coffin, 368 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Goerlich v. Goerlich, 358 So. 2d 895 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). We do not need to reach this question in this case,2 because we find there was no substantial change in the circumstances or the financial abilities of either party, and it was therefore an abuse of discretion to terminate the pe…
-
Pipitone v. Pipitone, 23 So. 3d 131 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…of property interests. Jantzen v. Cotner, 513 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). “For an award of money to be considered a property settlement and not alimony [for support] it must clearly appear to be so from the final judgment.” Goerlich v. Goerlich, 358 So. 2d 895, 896 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978) (citing Brisco v. Brisco, 355 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)); see Witter v. Witter, 443 So. 2d 417, 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (holding alimony provision was modifiable support because it did not state spe [*137] cifically that i…