DAN THOMAS

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins, 914 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 2005)
  …ment, State ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. State Board of Equalizers, 84 Fla. 592, 94 So. 681, 30 A.L.R. 362, or that his administration of the Act in question will require the expenditure of public funds, Steele v. Freel, 157 Fla. 223, 25 So. 2d 501. Barr, 70 So. 2d at 350 (emphasis added). And, for the very same reasons the court in Barr did not “feel bound by the dictum” in King or Cone that may seem contrary to this rule, I believe we are not bound to and should expressly disavow the dictum…
• Arnold v. Keither L. Shumpert, 217 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 1968)
  …al liability insurance. This is a plausible argument. However, “the right and authority of a ministerial officer to challenge any Act providing for disbursement of public funds is an exception to the above-cited rule,” Steele v. Freel, 157 Fla. 223, 25 So. 2d 501, 503 (1946); see Kaulakis v. Boyd, 138 So. 2d 505 (Fla.1962). Since the Commissioners would have to expend pub- [*120] lie funds to pay the insurance premiums, this special rule would appear to give them the necessary standing to question the consti…
• State v. Vocelle, 159 Fla. 88 (Fla. 1947)
  …the cited portions of the above statute. A litigant is not heard to urge the unconstitutionality of a statute who is not harmfully affected by the particular features of the statutes alleged to be in conflict with the constitution. Steele v. Freel, 157 Fla. 211, 25 So. (2nd) 501. The objections urged may be adjudicated when properly presented. The respondent’s demurrer is hereby sustained and the cause dismissed. THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD, ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur.…