MARY L. HANEY, APPELLANT,
v.
SPENCER A. HOLMES AND BARBARA J. HOLMES, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
MARY L. HANEY, APPELLANT,
SPENCER A. HOLMES AND BARBARA J. HOLMES, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
358 So. 2d 1188
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1978)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Mary L. Haney, plaintiff below, seeks to appeal an order which states “the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be in [sic] the same is hereby granted.” This is not a final decision, order, judgment or decree within the contemplation of Flori da Appellate Rule 3.2(b). Likewise, this case is not one which formerly would have been cognizable in equity, so the order is not subject to an interlocutory appeal. Fla. R.App.P. 4.2(a).
Therefore, we have no jurisdiction, and this appeal is hereby dismissed sua sponte. Rizzuto v. DiPaolo, 357 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Arnold v. Brady, 178 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).
BOARDMAN, C. J., and OTT and RYDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Zora Mae Arnold v. Louis R. Brady, M.D., 178 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Suburban Vill. Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. SUN Bank OF Gainesville, 357 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
- Rosario R. Rizzuto v. DiPAOLO, 357 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)