HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
ALFRED J. FLECHAS ET AL., APPELLEES
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
ALFRED J. FLECHAS ET AL., APPELLEES
358 So. 2d 1190
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Miller Elec. Co. v. Employers’ Liability Assur. Corp., 171 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965); Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. United Filigree Corp., 298 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. Stevenson, 598 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)…d that the jury’s verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence. This conclusion was error. A jury verdict is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence only when the evidence is “clear, obvious, and indisputable. Perenic v. Castelli, 358 So. 2d 1190, 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), cert. denied, 359 So. 2d 1211 (Fla.1978). In this case, the evidence was conflicting, but equally compelling in favor of both the appellants and Stevenson. Therefore the issue of whether the appellants were negligent was…
Authorities Cited
- Miller Elec. Co. OF Fla. v. The Emp'rs' Liab. Assurance Corp., 171 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)
- Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. United Filigree Corp., 298 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)