EMPIREGAS, INC., OF PENSACOLA, APPELLANT,
v.
HARVEY L. THOMAS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court abused its discretion by failing to enforce a noncompetition clause in an employment agreement, as the statute allows for such agreements and the proof justified an injunction.
Appellant sought to enforce a noncompetition clause in an employment agreement with appellee. The trial court refused to enforce the clause.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Damages cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to enforce a noncompetition clause in an employment agreement between it and appellee. We reluctantly agree and reverse. Section 542.12(2), Florida Statutes (1977), allows an employee to agree with his employer to “refrain from carrying on or engaging in a similar business and from soliciting old customers of such employer within a reasonably limited time and area.” The statute has been upheld by the Florida Supreme Court on several occasions. See Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Fla., Inc., 183 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 1966), app. dism. 385 U.S. 11, 87 S.Ct. 78, 17 L.Ed.2d 10; Miller Mechanical, Inc. v. Ruth, 300 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 1974). This court, construing the statute in Atlas Travel Service, Inc. v. Morelly, 98 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 1957), stated:
“The permissory language of the statute, whereby agreements of the character in suit ‘may’ in the ‘discretion’ of the court, ‘be enforced by injunction’ does not imply that the court is vested with any absolute or arbitrary discretion, and is construed as requiring that the discretion shall be reasonably exercised to the end that the object of the statute may not be nullified.”
With these precedents in mind, it is clear that the trial court abused its discretion here in failing to give effect to the agreement. The proof was sufficient to justify an injunction. We do not find, however, that there was sufficient proof of damages.
The order is therefore REVERSED as to injunctive relief and AFFIRMED as to damages. The case is remanded for the entry of an injunction.
MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Twenty Four Collection, Inc. v. Keller, 389 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…s would produce an “unjust result” in the form of an overly burdensome effect upon the employee. We specifically so held in Barco Chemicals Division, Inc. v. Colten, 296 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Accord, Empiregas, Inc., of Pensacola v. Thomas, 359 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), dismissed, 364 So. 2d 893 (Fla.1978); Royal Services, Inc. v. Williams, 334 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Foster and Company, Inc. v. Snodgrass, 333 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Storz Broadcasting Co. v. Courtney, 178 So. 2d…
-
SUN Elastic Corp. v. O.B. Indus., 603 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…our Collection, Inc. v. Keller, 389 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review denied, 419 So. 2d 1048 (Fla.1982); Answer All Telephone Secretarial Serv., Inc. v. Call 24, Inc., 381 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Empiregas, Inc. of Pensacola v. Thomas, 359 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), dismissed, 364 So. 2d 893 (Fla.1978); Royal Servs., Inc. v. Williams, 334 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Foster & Co. v. Snodgrass, 333 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Barco Chemicals Div., Inc. v. Colton, 296 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 3d…
Authorities Cited
- Reuben Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co. OF Fla., Inc., 183 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 1966)
- Miller Mech., Inc. v. Ruth, 300 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 1974)
- Atlas Travel Serv., Inc. v. Morelly, 98 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 1957)
- Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Fla., Inc., 385 U.S. 11 (U.S. 1966)