RONALD A. GREEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2006-05-03
No. 1D05-5861
KAHN, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ, concur.
931 So. 2d 146 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We AFFIRM the order denying the motion, but do so without prejudice to appellant’s refiling his jail credit claim in a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. See Burchfield v. State, 907 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

KAHN, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ensign v. State, 67 So. 3d 353 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
    …rt gave Ensign an opportunity to make a statement regarding whether he prevented his stepdaughter from attending school, the trial court failed to give him an opportunity to present mitigating evidence in regard to his sentence. See Gooden v. State, 931 So. 2d 146, 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Mendana v. Mendana, 911 So. 2d 130, 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). Rule 3.840(f) also requires a judgment of guilty to include “a recital of the facts constituting the contempt of which the defendant has been found and adjudicate…
  • Petty v. State, 263 So. 3d 307 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw