CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, A FLORIDA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

GENE ALLEN WATKINS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Bouler v. State, 389 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …e of notice of the wiretap required by section 934.09(7)(e), Florida Statutes (1977). Under these circumstances failure to meet the notice provisions of this statute have been held to not render the resulting evidence inadmissible. Hicks v. Florida, 359 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Quintana v. State, 352 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).1 Two recent Florida cases, State v. Goodley, 381 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) and Mata v. State, 380 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), have recognized that a trained narcotic…
• Daniels v. State, 381 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …rnett, 354 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1978), and authorities therein cited. .For a case involving the same wiretap denying a motion to suppress because of delay in service of the post-interception inventory required by F.S. 934.09 see Hicks v. State, 359 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). See also Eppes v. State, 354 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). . Whether an Assistant State Attorney can authorize an application for a wiretap. . Affirmed by a per curiam opinion by the Supreme Court of Florida, Angel v. State,…
• Jackson v. State, 416 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …ses identical to 18 U.S.C. § 2518(9) (1976), State v. Albano, 394 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Therefore, federal decisions interpreting the federal statute are instructive in determining the meaning of § 934.09(8). See generally, Hicks v. State, 359 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 364 So. 2d 886 (Fla.1978). The legislative history of 18 U.S.C. § 2518(9) indicates that a “proceeding” includes all adversary type hearings and would include “a trial itself, a probation revocation proceeding, or a hea…

Authorities Cited

• Phoenix Assurance Co. OF NEW York v. Merritt, 160 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
• Ervin Dexter Lillard v. City OF Miami, 220 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)