DERWIN BRENNAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
DERWIN BRENNAN, APPELLANT,
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
359 So. 2d 524
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978)
Caution
Cited by 37 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Green v. State, 93 Fla. 1076, 113 So. 121 (1927); Box v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co., 187 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); McKay v. Highlands Insurance Company, 287 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Laster v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 293 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Barnes v. Travelers Insurance Company, 342 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Compare: Allstate Insurance Company v. Korschun, 350 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Dufour v. State, 495 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 1986)…nstruction to the jury was sufficient to cure any taint which may have resulted from the jurors’ knowledge of the call. Clark v. State, 443 So. 2d 973 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210, 104 S.Ct. 2400, 81 L.Ed.2d 356 (1984); State v. Tresvant, 359 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 368 So. 2d 375 (1979). We therefore reject appellant’s contention. We now reach appellant’s claims as to error in the sentencing portion of the proceeding. First, appellant argues that the trial court erred in deny…
-
Tresvant v. State, 396 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…each other and others [*736] to commit these substantive crimes.1 A jury found Tresvant guilty on all counts.2 The trial court granted Tresvant a new trial on matters relating to jury conduct. The State appealed; we reversed. See State v. Tresvant, 359 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (Tresvant I). Upon remand, the trial court entered judgment against Tres-vant and sentenced him to concurrent indeterminate prison terms of six months to four years. Tresvant appealed. In the interim preceding the filing of Tresv…
-
Gonzalez v. State, 449 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)…ady stated that the scope of review on appeal from an order granting a new trial in a criminal case — the same as that in a civil case — is whether the appellant has made a clear showing that the trial court abused its discretion. State v. Tresvant, 359 So. 2d 524, 527 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 368 So. 2d 1375 (Fla. 1979). There is no authority for the proposition that the scope or nature of review should be different where the grant of a new trial is based on the weight of the evidence rather than on…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Green v. State, 93 Fla. 1076 (Fla. 1927)
- Augustin Gonzalez v. Dade Commonwealth Title & Abstract Co., 293 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
- Dan v. McKAY, 287 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Korschun, 350 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- BOX v. Mass. Bonding & Ins. Co., 187 So. 2d 58 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
- Barnes v. Travelers Ins. Co., 342 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)