THE FLORIDA BAR, PETITIONER,
v.
FRANK CLARK, III, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Frank Clark III, a suspended Florida attorney, sought reinstatement to the practice of law. The Florida Supreme Court held that restoration of civil rights following a felony conviction is a necessary prerequisite to obtaining the privilege of practicing law, whether one is suspended, disbarred, or a first-time applicant.
The Court held that restoration of civil rights following a felony conviction is a necessary prerequisite to obtaining the privilege of practicing law, whether one is a suspended attorney, a disbarred attorney, or a first-time applicant for admission to the Bar.
[1] Restoration of civil rights following a felony conviction is a necessary prerequisite to obtaining the privilege of practicing law.
[2] The requirement of restored civil rights applies to suspended attorneys, disbarred attorneys, and first-time applicants for admission to the Bar.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We now hold that restoration of civil rights following a felony conviction is a necessary prerequisite to obtaining the privilege of practicing law, whether one be a suspended attorney, a disbarred attorney, or a first-time applicant for admission to the Bar.”
Establishes the Court's holding that civil rights restoration is required uniformly across all categories of attorneys seeking to practice law.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceClark was suspended from the Florida Bar on November 19, 1975, following a felony conviction in federal court. A Bar referee conducted a hearing and f…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Reinstatement cases and more on FLexlaw
[*864] PER CURIAM.
Respondent, a suspended member of The Florida Bar,* seeks reinstatement to the active practice of law pursuant to the Florida Bar Integration Rule, Article XI, Rule 11.11. A hearing was held before a Bar referee, who made findings of fact and submitted a report and recommendation. The referee found that respondent has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that he meets the requirements for reinstatement and has shown his fitness to resume the practice of law. These findings are amply supported by the testimony in the record and are hereby approved and adopted. But the referee, nevertheless, recommended against reinstatement since respondent, having been convicted of a felony in federal court, has not had his civil rights restored. The referee expressed the opinion that it would be an anomalous situation to have an attorney entitled to practice before judges for whom he is not qualified to vote and juries upon which he is not qualified to sit.
Respondent filed a statement in opposition to the referee’s report. He points out that no decision of this Court has held that a suspended attorney who has been convicted of a felony must receive a pardon or restoration of civil rights before being reinstated.
The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar has made its recommendation. It urges that we deny the petition, arguing that restoration of civil rights should be a prerequisite to the resumption of the practice of law regardless of whether the disciplined attorney was disbarred or suspended.
It is true that a pardon or restoration of civil rights after a felony conviction has only been held specifically required in cases of first-time applicants and attorneys that have been disbarred. Perhaps the absence of a rule of decision holding such to be necessary for reinstatement of a suspended attorney is due to the fact that disbarment is the more customary form of discipline for a lawyer convicted of a felony. We now hold that restoration of civil rights following a felony conviction is a necessary prerequisite to obtaining the privilege of practicing law, whether one be a suspended attorney, a disbarred attorney, or a first-time applicant for admission to the Bar. We therefore deny respondent’s request for reinstatement. We do so without prejudice to his right to petition again when his civil rights have been restored, notwithstanding the provision of Rule 11.11(11). Execution is directed to issue for the costs of these proceedings against the respondent in the amount of $14.50.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, HATCH-ETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. ENGLAND, J., dissents.
*
Respondent was suspended November 19, 1975. The Florida Bar v. Clark, 323 So. 2d 579 (Fla.1975).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Fla. BAR Re: Sheldon J. Sanders, 580 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 1991)…in Florida of one disbarred in his home state. We also note that the record fails to demonstrate that Sanders has had his civil rights restored, a condition we require. The Florida Bar v. Moody, 577 So. 2d 1317 (Fla.1991); The Florida Bar v. Clark, 359 So. 2d 863 (Fla.1978). We therefore deny Sanders’ petition for reinstatement to The Florida Bar. Judgment for costs of $841.25 is hereby entered against Sanders, for which sum let execution issue. See R. Regulating Fla.Bar 3-7.-9(d), (n)(4). It is so ordered…
-
THE Florida BAR v. Moody, 577 So. 2d 1317 (Fla. 1991)…the recommendation that he be considered for reinstatement despite the fact that his civil rights may not have been restored.4 For this Court to accept the referee’s recommendation we would have to overrule our decision in The Florida Bar v. Clark, 359 So. 2d 863, 864 (Fla.1978), where we held “that restoration of civil rights following a felony conviction is a necessary prerequisite to obtaining the privilege of practicing law, whether one be a suspended attorney, a disbarred attorney, or a first-time appli…
-
THE Fla. BAR. Petition of Gregory M. Pahules, 382 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1980)…r does not allege, nor does the evidence show, that Mr. Pa-hules has had his civil rights restored. Restoration of civil rights is a prerequisite for reinstatement of a suspended attorney who has been convicted of a felony. The Florida Bar v. Clark, 359 So. 2d 863 (Fla.1978). It is the judgment of this Court that the petition for reinstatement is denied without prejudice to the petitioner’s right to petition again when he has successfully completed his probation, made restitution or has made satisfactory arr…
Authorities Cited
- THE Florida BAR v. Clark, 323 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 1975)