SELIGMAN OF FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A APPLEGREEN CONDOMINIUM APARTMENTS, APPELLANT,
v.
EDWARD F. RUGG AND HELEN P. RUGG, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
SELIGMAN OF FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A APPLEGREEN CONDOMINIUM APARTMENTS, APPELLANT,
EDWARD F. RUGG AND HELEN P. RUGG, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES
359 So. 2d 904
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellees sued for specific performance or in the alternative to recover their deposits on two condominium apartments. Ap-pellees abandoned the count for specific performance and the trial court found for the appellees on the second count for restitution.
We have fully considered appellant’s contentions but find on this record that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY, C. J., ANSTEAD, J., and SIL-VERTOOTH, LYNN N., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Robinson v. The Royal Bank OF Canada, 462 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)…7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). We grant the writ and quash the order. The trial court clearly departed from the essential requirements of law by refusing to decline jurisdiction as a matter of comity. See Bradley Investment, Inc. v. Vimy Investment, Inc., 359 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). A grant of stay is appropriate where two actions are pending simultaneously which involve the same parties and substantially the same causes of action. See Thomas v. English, 448 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). ANSTEAD, C.J.,…
-
DE Portela v. Portela, 631 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…ht may be obtained in the Dominican Republic, the jurisdiction which first exercised jurisdiction over the pending divorce action. See generally, Royal Globe Ins. Co. v. Gehl, 358 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Bradley Inv., Inc. v. Vimy Inv., Inc., 359 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Accordingly, we affirm the main appeal. In light of our disposition of the main appeal, the point raised on cross-appeal is moot.…