ROBERTO BORROTO, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• E.A.R. v. State, 4 So. 3d 614 (Fla. 2009)
  …ss-level-needs-of-the-child standard articulated by the First, Second, and Fifth District Courts of Appeal. See, e.g., N.B. v. State, 911 So. 2d 833, 835-36 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); M.S. v. State, 927 So. 2d 1044, 1046 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); J.M. v. State, 939 So. 2d 1138, 1139 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Our only modifications of the standard announced and applied by these courts stem directly from the statutory scheme, which, in addition to focusing upon rehabilitation, individualized treatment, and the juvenile court’s e…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• E.A.R. v. State, 975 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …cs of the restrictiveness level vis-a-vis the needs of the child.” Although A.G. cited A.C.N. in support of this proposition, the case expanded the language of A.C.N. by changing the phrase “have reference to” to “reference.” See also J.M. v. State, 939 So. 2d 1138, 1139 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (relying on A.G. for the proposition that a judge disregarding a DJJ commitment recommendation “must state its reasons and ‘must reference the characteristics of the restrictiveness level vis-a-vis the needs of the child’”)…

Authorities Cited

• Mundy v. State, 745 So. 2d 351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)