GARY LEE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2006-10-18
No. 3D06-1972
Before FLETCHER, SHEPHERD, and SUAREZ, JJ.
941 So. 2d 445 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
SUAREZ, J.

SUAREZ, J.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for post conviction relief. Defendant’s claim is time-barred and is not newly discovered evidence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(1).

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Williams v. State, 121 So. 3d 1114 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
    …ction relief); Williams v. McDonough, 965 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (table) (denying motion for rehearing en banc); Williams v. McDonough, 942 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (table) (denying petition for writ of habeas corpus); Williams v. State, 941 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (affirming denial of motion for postconviction relief); Williams v. State, 925 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (denying motion for rehearing); Williams v. Crosby, 888 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (table) (denying petition for writ o…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw