IN THE INTEREST OF I. D. K., A CHILD
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Adjudication Of Guilt cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The juvenile defendant herein pled guilty to one petition and not guilty to two other petitions. The juvenile was tried on the two not guilty pleas and found guilty. A motion to withdraw the guilty plea was made and denied. Eventually, the juvenile was adjudicated guilty of all three offenses and committed to the Division of Youth Services. Although certain procedural irregularities do appear in regard to acceptance of the initial plea of guilty, we are convinced from the totality of the record that the commitment to the Division of Youth Services was entirely proper and supported by the record and the adjudications of guilt on the two contested charges. These two adjudications are also before us on appeal and they are hereby affirmed. Since we believe the result to be the same, the matter below is affirmed in its entirety.
CROSS, ANSTEAD and BERANEK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Holloway v. State, 389 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. In re I.D.K., 360 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Franklin v. State, 226 So. 2d 461 (Fla.2d DCA 1969). Affirmed.…
-
D. M. v. State, 379 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See: In Interest of I. D. K., 360 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).…
-
A.C. v. State, 479 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…is correct, the adjudication of delinquency on the remaining four counts are not challenged herein and any one or all would be sufficient to sustain the order appealed. See J.B. v. State, 405 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); In the Interest of I.D.K., 360 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); W.S. v. State, 353 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Therefore the adjudication of delinquency is affirmed. Affirmed.…