WILLIE REMBERT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIE REMBERT, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
360 So. 2d 1307
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sneed v. State, 397 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)…he State is not authorized to inquire further than it would otherwise have been allowed to. Leonard v. State, 386 So. 2d 51 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). Cross examination regarding an irrelevant criminal incident constitutes reversible error.. Pack v. State, 360 So. 2d 1307 (Fla.2d DCA 1978); Henry v. State, 356 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). The nature of the crime for which appellant was previously convicted is not relevant to any issue in this case. Since appellant’s credibility was a critical factor for the jury’s…
-
Mitchell v. State, 491 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…of mistake or accident, but is inadmissible when the evidence is relevant solely to prove bad character or propensity. . Compare Justus v. State, 438 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 1983) and Warren v. State, 443 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) with Pack v. State, 360 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1978). In the latter case, the evidence of collateral bad acts served solely to establish the bad character of the defendant. In the former cases, as in the present case, the evidence of other bad acts was relevant to understanding the…