JOTE GORNITZ, APPELLANT,
v.
NATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Affirmed directed verdict for airline defendant where plaintiff failed to establish that airline negligence or employee violation of airline regulations proximately caused injury from fellow passenger's thrown garment bag.
An airline is not liable for injuries caused by a fellow passenger's actions when the plaintiff fails to establish that the airline or its employees' conduct was the proximate cause of the injury.
[1] Violation of an airline's internal regulations by airline personnel does not establish proximate causation for injuries caused by a third party's independent actions.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePlaintiff was injured on a National Airlines flight when a fellow passenger threw a garment bag over a seat back, striking the plaintiff.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Directed Verdict cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff in the trial court appeals an adverse final judgment after the granting of a directed verdict at the close of his case.
Appellant was injured by a fellow-passenger on a National Airlines flight when the fellow-passenger threw a garment bag over the back of the seat in which he was sitting and struck the plaintiff.
We affirm. No negligence has been demonstrated on the part of the airline or its employees. The appellant contends that the flight attendant violated certain regulations1 of the airline and, therefore, the airline was responsible. We disagree. First, assuming [which we do not find] that the airline personnel violated the regulations of the airline, this was not the cause of the injury and therefore the plaintiff failed to make a prima facie case. Secondly, even if the flight attendant had violated a regulation, this was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury. Therefore, the trial court was correct in directing a verdict. Smith’s Bakery, Incorporated v. Jernigan, 134 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961); Lake Parker Mall, Inc. v. Carson, 327 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976).
The final judgment here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.
. Appellant has called to our attention the recent case of Florida Freight Terminals, Inc. v. Cabanas, 354 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) which, in light of our disposition of this appeal, does not require a consideration thereof.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Lake Parker Mall, Inc. v. Laurenne A. Carson, 327 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)
- Fla. Freight Terminals, Inc. v. Cabanas, 354 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Smith's Bakery v. Jernigan, 134 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961)