EARL M. ALEXANDER, APPELLANT,

v.

GATEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY, PAUL RICE, JR., AMERICAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON AND AMERICAN MUTUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Driscoll v. Driscoll, 547 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
  …portion of the majority opinion which specifies the exact amount of the award. In my view, the case should be reversed on the issue of permanent periodic alimony and remanded to the trial court to set the amount of the award. See Douglas v. Douglas, 361 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); and Hubble v. Hubble, 214 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968). In all other respects I agree with the majority and would affirm.…
• Linna Fong Wing v. Wing, 429 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …. Wing. The length of the marriage, the needs of the wife, and the comparative opportunities for career advancement entitle Mrs. Wing to an award of permanent alimony. See Garrison v. Garrison, 380 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Douglas v. Douglas, 361 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). [*783] Recognizing that Mr. Wing’s temporarily reduced income renders an additional award impractical at the present time, we remand for the entry of a nominal award of permanent alimony which would permit Mrs. Wing to apply for…
• Eddy v. Eddy, 366 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …e note and mortgage awarded. However, in the 17-year interim, the amount paid to her, approximately $385.00 per month, is insufficient in view of the past and present circumstances of the parties and of the needs of the wife. In Douglas v. Douglas, 361 So. 2d 212, 214 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1978), the court held: We recognized that marital partners are to be treated on an equal basis; however, we noted that in a long-term marriage the trial court should consider the extent to which the wife has sacrificed her opport…

Authorities Cited

• Robert v. Johnson and Viola Johnson, 333 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)