STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
DANIEL BROCCA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2007-04-05
No. SC03-860
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur., QUINCE, J., dissents.
955 So. 2d 532 Florida Supreme Court (2007)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Brocea, 842 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), in which the Third District Court of Appeal cited State v. Hosty, 835 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), rev’d, 944 So. 2d 255 (Fla.2006), and certified the same question as was then pending review in this Court in Hosty. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3)-(4), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1981).

We have since reversed Hosty and answered a rephrased certified question in a manner contrary to the decision presently on review. See State v. Hosty, 944 So. 2d 255 (Fla.2006). We have thus determined and respondent does not contest that we should exercise our jurisdiction to grant the petition for review, quash the decision under review, and remand to the Third District Court for reconsideration upon application of this Court’s decision in Hosty.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw