DALE W. JOHNSON AND ROBERT V. CLARK, PETITIONERS,

v.

THE FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION AND CASIMIR M. SZPAK, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Preferred Mut. Ins. Co. v. Davis, 629 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
  …appear at hearing on motion for default deemed to have been caused by excusable neglect because counsel failed to properly note the hearing date on his calendar' — cause reversed and remanded for proceedings on the merits); Supro Corp. v. Bridwell, 361 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) (defendant’s failure to appear at trial shown to have occurred because the "file had been misplaced” due to the attorney "moving his official residence"; trial court would not impose severe penalty of default; new trial granted);…
• Bethesda Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Judie Laska, 977 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …ve mishandling and [*807] misrouting of suit papers between offices a “clear case” of excusable neglect. In Al Hendrickson Toyota Inc. v. Yampolsky, 695 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), a “calendaring” error was excusable. In Supro Corp. v. Bridwell, 361 So. 2d 734, 735 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), we found excusable counsel’s failure to appear at trial because his file had been misplaced. We summarized these holdings in Jeyanandarajan v. Freedman, 863 So. 2d 432, 433-34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) thus: “The pattern which e…
• Tele-Media Co. OF KEY W. v. Monroe Cnty., 391 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …controlled by our earlier deci [*377] sion, the trial court can still be correct even if the wrong reason was given. In Re Yohn’s Estate, 238 So. 2d 290 (Fla.1970); Croft v. Edwards, 353 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Supro Corporation v. Bridwell, 361 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Examining each count in light of the law of Florida, we determine that each count fails to state a cause of action, as follows: As to Count I-referendums are not necessary nor required for the County to enter into binding const…