EXECUTIVE COMMERCIAL SERVICES, LTD., AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
v.
SOUTH FLORIDA PARTS & SUPPLY, INC., JOSEPH J. DEMARCO, AND FRANCES DEMARCO, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court reversed the trial court's denial of a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution where no activity occurred for over one year and the plaintiff failed to show good cause in writing as required by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
An order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution may be reviewed by interlocutory appeal, and dismissal is proper when there is no activity for more than one year and the plaintiff fails to show good cause in writing.
[1] An order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution is an interlocutory order reviewable by interlocutory appeal, and erroneous filing of a petition for certiora…
[2] Dismissal for lack of prosecution is proper when no activity occurs for more than one year after filing and the plaintiff fails to show good cause in writing as required…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceExecutive Commercial Services, a defendant in the trial court, moved to dismiss for lack of prosecution after no activity occurred in the case for mor…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Dismiss For Lack Of Prosecution cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, which was a defendant in the trial court, has filed a petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of an order that denied its motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution. It used the wrong procedure in seeking this review. An order denying dismissal for lack of prosecution, even in an action formerly cognizable at law, is an interlocutory order which may be reviewed by interlocutory appeal. Fla.App. Rule 4.2. However, the erroneous filing of a petition for certiorari rather than a notice of interlocutory appeal does not justify dismissal where, as in this case, a proper review procedure is available and relief is timely sought. State v. Johnson, 306 So. 2d 102 (Fla.1975). We will treat the petition as an interlocutory appeal.
On the merits we find that the trial court erred in denying the motion to dismiss. There was no activity in this case for more than a year after the complaint was filed. If the plaintiffs had.some excuse for not serving their complaint on this defendant for more than one year after it was filed, they failed in their duty under Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.420(e) to show good cause in writing, at least five days before the hearing on the motion, why the action should remain pending. Koppers Company, Inc. v. Victoire Development Corp., 284 So. 2d 193 (Fla.1973).
REVERSED and REMANDED with directions that the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution be granted.
ALDERMAN, C. J., and DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Zebedee Johnson, Jr., 306 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 1974)
- Koppers Co., Inc. v. Victoire Dev. Corp., 284 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 1973)