SHELLEY ARTHUR AND LILLIAN ARTHUR, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,

v.

A. JAY CRISTOL, TRUSTEE, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Powell v. Powell, 386 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …ion, Powell admitted the allegation of the petition for modification that his ability to pay had materially changed for the better, and was able therefore successfully to resist the appellee’s attempted discovery on that point. Alterman v. Alterman, 361 So. 2d 773 (Fla.3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 368 So. 2d 1361 (Fla.1979); see Jacobs v. Jacobs, 50 So. 2d 169 (Fla.1951); Schottenstein v. Schottenstein, 384 So. 2d 933 (Fla.3d DCA 1980). .His position is that zero (Greene) plus zero (Zedeck) add up to zero. .…
• Granville v. Paulina Delp Granville, 445 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
  …e modifications requested, we find that the trial court erred in denying husband’s motion for protective order in that such denial would, in our opinion, result in irreparable harm that could not be cured on direct appeal.5 Cf. Alterman v. Alterman, 361 So. 2d 773 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Palmar v. Palmar, 402 So. 2d 20 (Fla.3d DCA 1981). Accordingly, husband’s petition for writ of certiorari is granted, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. THOMPSON, J., concurs. NIMMON…
• Eyster v. Eyster, 503 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …roceedings to address the former wife’s claim of increased financial need if the former husband stipulates to his financial ability to pay a reasonable increase in alimony. See Calvo v. Calvo, 489 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Alterman v. Alterman, 361 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 368 So. 2d 1361 (Fla.1979). In this modification proceeding, since the husband admits to being able to pay any reasonable increase in alimony, the sole disputed issue is whether the wife, due to changed financial n…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Jordan v. Sayre, 24 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1888)
• John M. Bullock et ux. v. Carlton Alford et ux., 192 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)