SHIRLEY TAPLIN, APPELLANT,
v.
SOL TAPLIN, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1978-08-22
No. 77-1742
Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
361 So. 2d 827 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant wife appeals an order denying her petition for modification and her petition for attorney’s fees. She urges error upon the argument that the manifest weight of the evidence established her need for, and the husband’s ability to respond to, an increase in alimony. We find that no error has been shown. See Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla.1977); and Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1976).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Millar v. State, 655 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
    …idence in the record to support the order. Blocker’s v. Yarborough, 277 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1973); Jantzen v. State, 422 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Lee v. State, 374 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Whispering Pines Lake Owners Ass’n v. Demosthenis, 361 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). In the present case, the uncontradict-ed expert testimony originally recommended that Millar be placed in the Renaissance Program in Jacksonville. These same experts later recommended Halifax in Daytona when it became known tha…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw